“I might describe myself as a socialist. I describe myself as a progressive”. These have been Labour chief Keir Starmer’s phrases in Might 2024 shortly after his first speech of the election marketing campaign. Labour’s structure defines it as a democratic socialist occasion. So, in concept, Starmer is a socialist.
However what’s socialism? One idea of socialism characterises it as being about collective possession in pursuit of the general public good, over non-public possession for revenue.
Some see a dedication to financial equality as what distinguishes socialism from different ideologies. Others specify co-operation and group reigning over individualism as defining socialism. Or, socialism might be seen as a motion for, or of, the working class.
Whichever it’s, democratic socialism is about constructing a society past capitalism.
The day after Starmer proclaimed himself a socialist, his shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves was requested about his assertion and responded that she was a social democrat. Social democracy is about socialism, however inside capitalism moderately than past it.
Reeves’ definition of social democracy by way of equal alternatives, good public companies, and safe work that pays (very a lot in tune with Starmer’s platform) doesn’t go so far as socialism inside capitalism. Others throughout the political spectrum may agree with the values she outlined.
Starmer was energetic in socialist politics in his youth. However we must always determine the place he stands by what he says and does now. Labour’s purges of socialists within the occasion have led some to conclude that Starmer desires rid of those that may attempt to maintain him to socialist rules.
What do Starmer’s statements of values and rules inform us? In 2020 he argued for “ethical socialism”, so an method that’s based mostly on values as a lot as constructions.
He highlighted injustice particularly, but additionally inequality. There’s a left-of-centre and even socialist tone to the ethical socialism he advocated then. However was he simply attempting to win over Corbynite members for his occasion management bid?
In a 2021 pamphlet on his philosophy as chief Starmer shifted to values of safety and alternative, which he has since continued to place centre stage. He stated class holds folks again, confused group over individualism, and energetic authorities over the free market.
You don’t must be a socialist to imagine in safety and alternative. Nevertheless, class inequality, group, and energetic authorities have left-of-centre or socialist connotations.
From values to insurance policies
However the proof of a philosophy is within the apply. Labour will arrange Nice British Vitality, a publicly owned firm to put money into renewables. Starmer says he’ll carry passenger prepare companies in-house, and facilitate municipal insourcing and possession, and extra co-ops.
These are small steps to extra collective possession within the financial system and public companies. However social possession may very well be far more widespread, particularly given public help for it, together with for the vitality utilities, water provide and the Royal Mail.
Starmer talks in regards to the tackling the “class ceiling” for working class folks and about inequality, particularly in insurance policies (or intentions) on training and the brand new deal for working folks. However the emphasis is on equal or minimal alternatives for all moderately than a extra economically equal society.
He’ll fund insurance policies by clamping down on tax breaks for the privileged and a windfall tax on vitality utilities. However vital redistributional adjustments to the tax construction, on revenue or wealth, aren’t proposed.
Starmer expresses sentiments of group and co-operation over individualism. However these are usually utilized in relation to insurance policies on safety, devolution, localities, a extra energetic state, or partnership with enterprise, moderately than establishments of a extra particularly socialist kind.
Alamy
In truth, Starmer’s perspective on group has metamorphosed into advocacy of a “contribution society”. That is used to imply various issues, equivalent to that individuals and enterprise ought to contribute moderately than being individualistic, and that their contribution ought to be rewarded decently. That is about accountability and reward as a lot as group in a socialist sense.
What’s trendy socialism?
If socialism on the definitions I’ve outlined isn’t being proposed by Starmer, it may very well be that he’s redefining socialism for contemporary Britain. If this includes new means for pursuing socialism, he’s not propounding this.
If it’s redefining socialism as one thing past collective possession, equality, and co-operation, that’s not rethinking socialism for a brand new period. It’s dropping what makes socialism distinctive.
If it includes a extra intersectional socialism, Starmer is proposing measures on race equality and violence in opposition to girls, however these match his self-description as “progressive” greater than being “socialist”.
Starmer may very well be placing ahead restricted insurance policies for the overall election, solely to then come out as extra leftist in workplace. Energetic authorities may very well be prolonged to wider social possession; alternatives for the working class expanded to a extra equal construction to society, a basis additionally for better group. Starmer shouldn’t be advocating such a route. However down it, he may simply have a case for calling himself a socialist.
