Rachel Reeves had hardly stepped down from the dispatch field to make her first huge assertion as chancellor of the exchequer earlier than dealing with a livid backlash. She had claimed to have found a £22bn gap in public funds upon taking workplace and was utilizing it to clarify why the brand new Labour authorities is not going to be spending huge to save lots of failing public companies. Later, she instructed Sky Information that her predecessor Jeremy Hunt had “knowingly and intentionally lied” in regards to the UK’s monetary place.
Hunt took subject with the veracity of Reeves’s claims and accused her of discrediting politics by calling him a liar.
Hunt additionally is aware of that Reeves’ claims are designed to discredit – as soon as and for all – the Conservative Get together’s long-established fame for financial administration. This fame is probably the most beneficial electoral asset for what’s arguably the world’s most profitable political get together. As The Economist describes, latest occasions apart, the Conservative get together has “been within the enterprise of successful elections because the 1830s”.
A tarnished model can wreck a celebration’s electoral prospects for a era or extra. Simply ask the Liberal Democrats about tuition charges. Ask the Tories about Black Wednesday in 1992, when John Main withdrew the UK from the European Trade Price Mechanism.
The 2022 mini-budget may show a watershed, with former Conservative prime minister Liz Truss and her chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng extensively blamed for crashing the UK economic system. The catastrophe has actually been cited as a key purpose for the Conservative loss in 2024 however it has not but proved to be a great tool for Reeves as chancellor.
Need extra politics protection from tutorial specialists? Each week, we convey you knowledgeable evaluation of developments in authorities and truth verify the claims being made.
Join our weekly politics publication, delivered each Friday.
The potential reward for Labour, if it is ready to seize the mantle of financial competence from the Tories, is big. However so is the problem of unravelling one of the vital cussed narratives in UK politics. Labour has all the time been the tax-and-spend get together and the Conservatives the get together of fiscal prudence.
This narrative is partly a historical past written by the victors: a results of the Conservatives having spent a lot time in workplace. However, as former SNP spin physician Kevin Pringle has argued, it’s additionally partly defined by Labour being “notoriously dangerous at speaking a optimistic and even truthful story about its time in workplace, which leaves the sector free for the Tories to promote a malign one”.
‘I’m afraid there isn’t any cash’
Nothing demonstrates Labour’s expertise for handing away a story higher than what occurred within the wake of Labour’s 2010 election loss.
It was then that Liam Byrne, Labour’s outgoing chief secretary to the Treasury, left a be aware for his successor in his workplace that learn: “Expensive Chief Secretary; I’m afraid there isn’t any cash. Variety regards – and good luck! Liam.”
No matter Byrne’s motives, the be aware was a catastrophic error of judgement. It was a political personal aim that appeared to make gentle of an financial despair that had ruined thousands and thousands of lives and livelihoods. It was additionally a present to the Conservatives: a ready-made headline and a priceless “prop” that David Cameron might brandish when campaigning. The be aware made as many appearances on the 2015 election marketing campaign path as a cupboard minister.
Alamy/Tim Eire
Byrne was actually solely collaborating in an extended custom of including a private contact in the course of the peaceable and orderly switch of energy. Since Churchill – and presumably earlier than – political leaders have left recommendation, high-proof alcoholic items, insults, occasional catastrophes, and jokes like Byrne’s for his or her successors to search out.
A key instance stems from the 1964 basic election – a slender victory for Harold Wilson’s Labour get together – and an apology that’s typically in comparison with Byrne’s be aware in 2010 (not least by Byrne himself). Handing over the workplace, and the economic system, to the incoming chancellor (and future PM), Jim Callaghan, the outgoing chancellor Reginald Maudling stated he was sorry “to go away it on this form”.
However Maudling’s apology to Callaghan was spoken, not written. It couldn’t be used as Byrne’s be aware was. As Mad Males’s Don Draper as soon as remarked: “you possibly can’t body a cellphone name”.
The Conservatives might refer again to Byrne’s be aware each time they have been challenged on financial issues. And this tactic has had completely no expiry date. We final heard about it in parliament on April 24 this yr, over a decade after the very fact, when then deputy prime minister Oliver Dowden talked about it to proceed a story entrenched by Cameron and George Osborne in 2010: “that painful cuts to the general public sector have been necessitated by the outgoing Labour administration’s irresponsible borrowing”.
Labour now seeks to show this similar narrative towards the Tories. When Darren Jones spoke of coming into his new workplace as chief secretary to the Treasury lately, he remarked: “there was no be aware in my drawer in any respect, so perhaps they’ll’t afford the notepaper to write down a be aware on … who is aware of?”
Alamy
Or perhaps the Conservatives, having so efficiently deployed Byrne’s be aware, have been by no means going to repeat his mistake.
In his comment, Jones had inadvertently identified Labour’s downside completely: “there was no be aware”.
Labour doesn’t but have a comparable talisman that can be utilized to construct (or repossess) a story. They’ll’t simply invoke the 2022 mini-budget – and the crashing of the UK economic system – by waving round Liz Truss’s 40-page development plan.
And positive sufficient, as an alternative of believing Reeves when she says the nation’s funds are in a worse state than she anticipated, the nation’s response has been to query why she was shocked by something, having had entry to the figures for a while. This can be completely true but when Byrne’s story tells us something, it’s {that a} profitable story may be constructed round little or no in politics.
These processes do, nevertheless, take time. Labour is already planning for 2029, “sowing a political narrative of being left a disastrous monetary inheritance by the Conservatives, whereas positioning themselves because the fixers”. Nevertheless, in making an attempt to sow this narrative, Labour is, to date, taking part in catch-up, and they’re nonetheless taking part in by the Conservatives’ guidelines.
