The Chief Administrative Auditor (Ombudsman) reported that the Ministry of Inside responded late to the grievance petition of a citizen named Erdoğan Şahiner by not complying with the 30-day interval within the Structure and the Good Administration Regulation, and thus acted opposite to the Structure and the legislation.
Ombudsman İlkan Varol revealed his report relating to the appliance of a citizen named Erdoğan Şahiner.
Within the report, Varol acknowledged {that a} citizen named Erdoğan Şahiner claimed that “he constructed a home on his actual property in Yedidalga village after acquiring the required permits, that he discovered that the highway passing subsequent to his actual property handed by his actual property because of the measurements taken later, that he utilized to the Ministry of Inside with petitions relating to this example on August 19, 2016, June 22, 2018 and June 3, 2020 and didn’t obtain any outcomes” and requested that the problem be investigated by the division.
Varol famous that upon utility, the problem was examined inside the framework of the principles of the “Excessive Administrative Auditor (Ombudsman) Regulation No. 38/1996” and the next report was ready:
“Within the utility made by Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner to our Division, data relating to the problem was requested from the TRNC Ministry of Inner Affairs, Division of Settlement and Rehabilitation, with a view to consider the problem extra precisely.
Within the response letter dated March 2, 2023 from the TRNC Ministry of Inside, the Division of Settlement and Rehabilitation acknowledged that the problem of Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner was considered by the Division of Settlement and Rehabilitation, that Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner had submitted his petition dated June 22, 2018 to the Basic Coordination Workplace of the Ministry of Inside, and that the related Division had responded to the Basic Coordination Workplace on September 25, 2019, that Mr. Şahiner's petitions dated August 19, 2016 and June 3, 2020 have been transferred to the Settlement Committee with a view to produce a choice, and {that a} choice was taken, that the choice was offered to the related individual by the Settlement Committee with the letter dated January 5, 2023 and numbered İKMÖ.0.00-363/01-22/E.6409, and that the highway deliberate to be constructed within the first stage belongs to Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner. It didn’t cross by the parcel numbered 370/1/1/3, however by the center of the parcel numbered 370/2/1, which was allotted to a different individual because of a mistake, and divided the parcel into two. With a view to remedy the issue of Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner, the issues within the parcel numbered 370/1/1/3, which is his personal property with a title deed, and the parcel numbered 370/2/1, which incorporates the residence and land allotted within the title of Mr. Nuri Özkan, and the parcel numbered 359/1, which incorporates the residence and land allotted within the title of Mr. Kemal Çolak, have been evaluated along with the issues within the parcel numbered 370/2/1, and the parcel numbered 359/1, and the problem was transferred to the Settlement Committee, and the Committee took a choice dated November 8, 2022 and numbered İS.KOM 783/2022. Within the mentioned choice, it was acknowledged that by establishing a residence and/or constructing on the parcel numbered 370/1/3, which is Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner's actual property with a title deed, Mr. Nuri Özkan's allotted parcel numbered 370/2/1 and the highway there, and with a view to defend this residence and/or constructing, the highway was canceled with the approval of the City Planning Division, and a brand new highway was marked and processed on the map as the prevailing highway. As well as, it was added to the map. He acknowledged that by including the realm proven, which is roughly 667 sq. meters, to Mr. Erdoğan Şahiner’s space, Mr. Şahiner was not victimized, quite the opposite, the occupation and/or violation he had dedicated knowingly and/or unknowingly was protected and an space of roughly 667 sq. meters was given to Mr. Şahiner.”
The Ombudsman report additionally included the articles in query, stating that the appropriate to petition is regulated in Article 76 of the TRNC Structure and the appropriate of people to use to the competent authorities in writing relating to their very own or public requests and complaints is regulated in Article 15 of the Good Administration Regulation No. 27/2013.
It was decided that Erdoğan Şahiner's petitions relating to his grievance to the Ministry of Inside, dated August 19, 2016, June 22, 2018 and June 3, 2020, have been evaluated by the Housing and Rehabilitation Division Directorate, finalized because of the choice taken by the Housing Committee on November 8, 2022, and submitted to him in writing on January 5, 2023, and the next statements have been included on the finish of the report:
“The TRNC Ministry of Inner Affairs responded late to the petitions submitted by Mr. Şahiner in return for a receipt, by not complying with the 30-day durations laid out in Article 76 of the TRNC Structure and Article 15 of the Good Administration Regulation No. 27/2013.
By not responding to Mr. Erşahin’s petition in a well timed method, the administration acted in violation of Article 76 of the TRNC Structure and Article 15, paragraph 3 of the Good Administration Regulation No. 27/2023.”
