CTP Chairman Tufan Erhürman, in his assertion on social media, argued that the federal government took a step towards democracy and the rule of legislation by disregarding the foundations of legislation within the Parliament. He touched upon the next factors in his assertion:
Request for Opinion and Authorized Opinions: He said that it was not the CTP that requested the opinion of the three legal professionals within the Parliament, however that the request was made by the Presidency of the Parliament. These legal professionals, of their written opinion to the Presidency of the Parliament on October 22, said that the “double seals” had been invalid.
Authorized Conclusions: In consensus of all three legal professionals, Mr. He said that Öztürkler acquired 23 votes in favor and 23 towards within the final vote, so he was not elected as president. On this context, in addition they warned that the Council ought to be convened within the Parliament.
Authorities's Step: Erhürman said that the federal government didn’t take these warnings into consideration and with out even contemplating the necessity to convene the Council, regardless of the damaging opinions of three legal professionals within the Parliament, Mr. He said that he had the choice printed stating that Öztürkler was elected. Then Mr. He said that Öztürkler sat in his workplace.
Democracy and Rule of Legislation: Describing this case as a “democracy bloodbath”, Erhürman emphasised that they are going to shield the rule of legislation and democracy, primarily based on the primary article of the TRNC Structure. “Underneath these circumstances, the views of those that ignore the Parliament, democracy and the rule of legislation are as irrelevant to us as the brand new Speaker of the Parliament,” he expressed his response.
Erhürman's assertion, whereas revealing the opposition social gathering's dedication to proceed its battle for rights and legislation within the Parliament, drew consideration as a powerful criticism of the federal government's steps.
