Erhürman, who made a press release from his private social media account, mentioned, “Anybody can defend the answer mannequin he desires in regards to the Cyprus downside, and there’s no impediment to this politically. Nonetheless, it’s not acceptable to attempt to justify themselves by distorting historic phenomena. ” Erhürman identified that the federation has been negotiated by Turkish Cypriot leaders for years in session with Türkiye.
Erhürman, who contributed to the discussions with a historic instance, recalled his speech on the Normal Meeting of the Parliament on 1 February 1974 by Prime Minister Bülent Ecevit. Ecevit, “Cyprus consisting of two communities in Cyprus to guard the standing of equal sovereignty and to make sure a peaceable cooperation within the state administration is probably the most correct answer is a federative system,” mentioned Erhürman, “I want to make data -based discussions in entrance of the general public,” he mentioned.
All the assertion of Erhürman is as follows:
“Is the Federation a thesis initially put ahead by the Turkish aspect? The Federation Answer Mannequin is a components supervisor who will scale back the Turkish Cypriots to the minority or make them assimilate?
We at all times say: You’ll be able to defend which answer mannequin you need in regards to the Cyprus downside. There isn’t a impediment to this politically, it can’t be in democracy. If you want, it’s also possible to say “non -solution is an answer”. No person can forestall this.
However it’s not acceptable to try to distort historic phenomena so as to make errors on the “data” degree or politically justify your self.
As we mentioned earlier than, claiming that the federation would cut back the Turkish Cypriots to the minority or that they are going to make them assimilate, it means to say that every one Turkish Cypriot leaders who’ve mentioned the Federation in session with Turkey as much as Crans Montana.
Because the discussions have been restarted, it’s helpful to make a remark with a instance of historical past (in fact there are lots of examples). Date: February 1, 1974. A Chapter from the Prime Minister Bülent Ecevit of the interval to the Normal Meeting of the Nationwide Meeting of the thirty seventh Republican Authorities program:
“In Cyprus, which consists of two communities, probably the most correct answer for the safety of the equal sovereignty standing of the Turkish society and to make sure a peaceable cooperation between the 2 communities within the state administration can be in a federative system. Such an answer will strengthen the integrity and independence of Cyprus. We consider that it is going to be a foundation. Within the motion, equivalent to realism and goodwill, such a conclusion will serve the lengthy -term frequent pursuits and regional peace in one of the simplest ways. ” (Parliamentary, Prime Minister and Normal Meeting speeches, Quantity 7, p. 381).
Wishing data -based discussions in entrance of the general public … “
