Help trulyindependent journalism
Discover out extraShut
Our mission is to ship unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds energy to account and exposes the reality.
Whether or not $5 or $50, each contribution counts.
Help us to ship journalism with out an agenda.
Angela Rayner’s planning “revolution” will see London’s housebuilding goal slashed by 20,000 properties, regardless of a wider push to spice up the variety of homes being constructed every year.
The deputy prime minister and housing secretary unveiled a serious overhaul of the planning system as we speak, which is able to see all councils in England given new, obligatory housing targets as a part of a plan to ship 1.5 million extra properties within the UK.
She warned that Britain is dealing with the “most acute housing disaster in residing reminiscence”, claiming that the variety of new properties is about to drop under 200,000 this 12 months – one thing Ms Rayner dubbed “unforgivable”.
The general housing goal for the UK will improve to 370,000, changing the earlier Tory authorities’s advisory goal of 300,000 properties per 12 months.
However authorities officers stated London’s goal would fall from 100,000 properties per 12 months to 80,000.
Ms Rayner claimed the earlier determine was “absolute nonsense” and an “arbitrary determine”, denying that the federal government is “decreasing our ambition for London”.
However Priced Out, a gaggle campaigning for extra inexpensive properties, warned that London is already “probably the most unaffordable place within the nation”.
Freddie Poser, the organisation’s govt director, stated: “Rayner has caught to her ambition to get housebuilding transferring and raised the nationwide goal to 370,000 which could be very welcome.
“It’s a disgrace to see a 20 per cent drop within the London goal proposed – that is precisely the place we needs to be constructing properties.
“London is probably the most unaffordable place within the nation, new properties within the metropolis would have an outsized affect on fixing the housing scarcity. PricedOut might be responding to the session to suggest the federal government preserve the goal at 100,000.”
The brand new guidelines set out within the Commons as we speak will reverse the choice made final 12 months to water down housing targets, which noticed them change into advisory, as an alternative making them obligatory for native governments.
Referring to the change within the guidelines overseen by the earlier Conservative authorities, Ms Rayner stated: “They knew this could tank the housing provide, however they nonetheless did it.”
Along with restoring obligatory housing targets, the strategy used to calculate them can even be up to date, the housing secretary stated, claiming that the earlier technique relied on “decade-old knowledge”.
The division stated the brand new technique would require councils to make sure properties are in-built the correct locations and growth is proportionate to the dimensions of current communities, “whereas including an additional degree of ambition in probably the most unaffordable areas”.
In the meantime, any inexperienced belt land launched for growth might be topic to “golden guidelines” to make sure it delivers 50 per cent inexpensive properties and has entry to inexperienced areas and infrastructure, comparable to colleges and GP surgical procedures.
Shadow housing secretary Kemi Badenoch questioned why constructing targets in London had been being decreased, saying: “The federal government is in peril of selecting the worst of all worlds.”
She added: “It’s not addressing the essential economics of housebuilding, it’s centralising decision-making, and if you have a look at all that it appears like 1.5 million might be a distant aspiration somewhat than a significant goal.”
However addressing issues over the adjustments, Ms Rayner instructed the Commons: “To this, I say we now have a housing disaster and a mandate for actual change, and all of us should play our half.
“Second, that some areas would possibly seem to get a stunning goal – effectively, no technique is ideal and the outdated one produced all kinds of wierd outcomes. Crucially, ours presents additional stability for native authorities.
“Third, that we’re decreasing our ambition for London. I’m clear we’re doing no such factor. That London had a nominal goal of just about 100,000 properties a 12 months based mostly on an arbitrary uplift was absolute nonsense.
“The adoption of the London plan has a goal of round 52,000 and supply in London final 12 months was round 35,000.
“The goal we’re now setting for London – roughly 80,000 – remains to be an enormous ask however I do know it’s one which the mayor is decided to rise to and I met with him final week about this.
“Fourth, some will say a complete of 370,000 shouldn’t be sufficient. To this, I say ambition is essential however we additionally should be practical.”
Kate Henderson, chief govt of the Nationwide Housing Federation, welcomed the announcement, saying: “It’s nice to see the federal government place social and inexpensive housing on the coronary heart of its plans for tackling the housing disaster.
“We strongly welcome the federal government’s dedication to reintroducing extra bold obligatory housing targets, recognising the significance of social rented properties, and to overhauling the planning system, which we now have lengthy been calling for.
“These adjustments are an vital first step to rising provide, and we agree with the secretary of state that to achieve the federal government’s goal of 1.5 million new properties over this parliament, we should considerably improve the provision of social and inexpensive housing.”
However Jonathan Cox, companion and head of social housing at specialist legislation agency Anthony Collins, known as for a extra “holistic answer” to deal with the housing scarcity, warning: “Merely piling but extra strain onto native authorities by rising obligatory housebuilding targets received’t work, nevertheless. Social housing suppliers are already deeply involved concerning the affect of regulatory pressures comparable to Awaab’s Regulation and new client requirements, that are inserting them below vital monetary strain.
“Many are merely unable to fund the upgrades required so it’s essential the sector has the monetary capability to fulfill the federal government’s worthy growth intentions. A extra holistic answer is required to deal with the housing scarcity and facilitate extra social housing growth.”