In September, the choice to droop or not the Auditor Common shall be issued, as requested by the Authorized Service, stated the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Antonis Liatsos, after the tip of the listening to.
The Legal professional Common's lawyer, Dinos Kallis, argued that the essential parts of conduct that established the inappropriate conduct within the case of the previous Assistant Legal professional Common, Rikkos Erotokritos, are additionally legitimate on this case.
He talked about that within the Erotokritos case, the then Assistant Legal professional Common solely implied impeachment twice by the Legal professional Common, whereas on this specific case, the occasions the Auditor Common implied legal offenses towards the Legal professional Common and Assistant Legal professional have been quite a few.
He added that after the choice of the Anti-Corruption Authority acquitting the Assistant Legal professional Common, Odysseas Michaelidis didn’t respect it and arrange fashionable courts.
The Legal professional Common's lawyer, Joe Triantafyllidis, stated there’s completely no connection between the 2 circumstances.
“We can’t,” he stated, “declare that the info of the Erotokritos case are equivalent.”
Mr. Triantafyllidis famous that Rikkos Erotokritou didn’t indicate that the Legal professional Common was suspected of tithing, however straight accused him of tithing, for which he apologized.
He added that this very reprehensible conduct of Mr. Erotokritos justified his suspension.
Supply: RIK Radio, Chrystalla Olympiou
AKO/MX
