In response to a query from the Greek State Radio and Tv RIK, “When will Southern Cyprus get hold of pure gasoline from its personal fields?”, Minister of Vitality Papanastasiu introduced that Southern Cyprus pure gasoline can be on the markets in 2027 inside the framework of his ministry's plan.
0
A +
A –
Print
It was said that Greek Vitality Minister Yorgos Papanastasiu introduced up a brand new timetable for pure gasoline.
In its information titled “Cyprus Pure Fuel on the Markets in 2027”, Alithia newspaper contains points such because the stagnation skilled by Southern Cyprus within the vitality area, in addition to the federal government's failure to reply to customers' expectations of low cost electrical energy from the top of 2023 or the start of 2024, and the brand new statements of the Minister of Vitality, Giorgos Papanastasiu. gave.
In accordance with the information, Minister of Vitality Papanastasiu, in response to a query from Greek State Radio and Tv RIK asking “When will Southern Cyprus get hold of pure gasoline from its personal fields?”, introduced that Southern Cyprus pure gasoline can be on the markets in 2027 inside the framework of his ministry's plan.
Papanastasiu says it is a tough query to reply as a result of; He said that it’s associated to financial system, funding, inexperienced transition and geopolitical points because of the occasions prevailing within the area.
Stating that the Ministry's purpose is for Southern Cyprus pure gasoline to enter the markets in early 2027, Papanastasiu said that their plans are like this.
Relating to the pure gasoline terminal in Vasiliko, Papanastasiu additionally stated that the undertaking is anticipated to be delivered by the CPP firm by the top of 2024.
Papanastasiu said that there was nothing new within the negotiations with ENI, the corporate that holds the license for the “Kronos 1” and “Kronos 2” deposits.
Making a press release relating to the rejection of the second proposal relating to Chevron and the “Aphrodite” deposit, Papanastasiu said that there was no disagreement and that some explanations had been requested, given a six-month interval.
Papanastasiu stated that they felt the necessity to get hold of extra data to be able to make the trail clearer, and likewise said that this was not associated to floating amenities or pure gasoline locations.
Stating that the plan of action of each events is frequent and due to this fact an evidence is required, Papanastasiu avoided giving particulars about whether or not the dispute with the Chevron firm relating to the floating facility has been resolved or whether or not it’s included within the second proposal.
