“And the deliberate reference to 'The President's Spouse Fund' is offensive,” says the federal government spokesman
Following the advice of the Authorized Service concerning doable unconstitutional provisions, the President of the Republic, because the guardian of the Structure, reported to the Supreme Constitutional Court docket the amending Legislation of the Unbiased Social Help Company, Authorities Spokesman Konstantinos Letymiotis states in a written assertion, including that “the Supreme The Constitutional Court docket will rule and its determination might be absolutely revered.”
The choice of the President of the Republic to discuss with the Legislation, in accordance with Mr. Letympiotis, “relies on the duty and accountability that derive from his workplace, in instances the place there are provisions that contact on compatibility with the Structure, which is the supreme legislation of the Republic and no legislation might in any approach be opposite or inconsistent with any of its provisions or with any obligation imposed on the Republic”.
The Authorities Spokesperson states that “the try to politicize a difficulty in regards to the Structure causes a very unfavourable impression, particularly when it’s completed by invoking transparency and accountability, that are assured anyway, because the checklist of donors is shared each with the Audit Service and within the Home of Representatives”.
“And the deliberate reference to “Fund of the President's spouse” is insulting,” he underlines.
It additionally states that the Fund is managed by the Accountant Normal of the Republic and all accounts are submitted to the Auditor Normal and Parliament with full transparency.
In line with Mr. Letympiotis, the spouse of the respective President of the Republic presides over the Company, which was established in 2014, like different charitable organizations, within the context of the social motion it develops.
“It’s not less than spectacular the operation of distorting the actual info, in addition to the response to the point out of doable unconstitutional provisions, even supposing most of them have already been raised throughout the debate within the competent committee of the Home of Representatives”, he concludes.
