The Ministry of Agriculture and Pure Assets objected to the adulteration evaluation and said that the olive oil of one of many two corporations that requested a re-analysis was discovered to be adulterated once more and {that a} penalty could be imposed on the corporate in query.
Within the assertion made by the Ministry, it was reminded that on account of the inspections carried out for adulteration evaluation in 5 districts between January 4-25, 66 olive oil samples had been taken and on account of the analyzes carried out in line with ECN 42, 47 olive oil samples had been decided to be applicable and 19 olive oil samples had been decided to be adulterated.
Within the assertion, it was said that two corporations, that are the producers/sellers of the three adulterated olive oils, exercised their proper to object based mostly on the seventh paragraph of Article 19 of the Regulation No. 38/2023 on Olives and Olive Merchandise and requested a re-analysis of the witness pattern. and in line with the outcomes of the evaluation report, it was famous that the oil in query was detected as adulterated.
Within the assertion, it was said that because the firm acted opposite to the eighth article, 4th paragraph of the Regulation No. 38/2023 on Olives and Olive Merchandise, an administrative penalty could be imposed on the corporate based mostly on the twenty eighth article, 4th paragraph, paragraph A of the mentioned Regulation.
Within the assertion, it was said that the outcomes of the opposite firm's inspection and evaluation report are awaited, and detailed info will likely be shared with the press after the laboratory outcomes arrive.
