Communal Democracy Celebration (TDP) Chairman Zeki Çeler famous that “The inner rules of the Parliament are clear, a candidate that a lot of the deputies don’t want will be elected because the Speaker of the Parliament” and that 23 can’t be proven to be older than 25.
Arguing that the opinion of the Chief Public Prosecutor's Workplace relating to the Parliamentary Election isn’t legally binding, Çeler said that the “applicable” opinion given by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Workplace “might be political, not authorized.”
Making a written assertion, Çeler stated that what was supposed when making the Inner Laws of the Meeting was “5. He famous that “to make sure that those that get the bulk within the first spherical win”, and that in an election with a single candidate, “to elect an accepted individual as president” with a purpose to proceed the work of the Meeting correctly.
Çeler stated, “A candidate that almost all of the MPs don’t want can’t be elected because the Speaker of the Parliament. The other can not occur in any democratic apply. “What occurred final night time can’t be interpreted as 'He gained with 23 votes as a result of he was the one candidate',” he stated.
Reminding that the Nationwide Unity Celebration (UBP) stated “We’ll get an opinion from the Chief Public Prosecutor's Workplace” relating to the election outcomes, Çeler made the next evaluation on this difficulty:
“The opinion of the Chief Public Prosecutor is simply an opinion. It has no authorized binding in any way. Furthermore; “Whereas the statute is so clear and unambiguous, a opposite opinion given by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Workplace can be political, not authorized.”
