The investigation of the criticism was discontinued because the Anti-Corruption Authority dominated that the complaints should not associated to acts of corruption
An nameless criticism towards a trainer working at a faculty within the Paphos District was introduced earlier than the impartial Anti-Corruption Authority.
Within the stated criticism, the complainants calling themselves “Nameless Equal Rights Educators” requested an investigation into the repeated and unjustified absences of a trainer primarily based in a village within the district of Paphos. Their demand is to hold out an investigation relating to trainer absences from work, creating problems with dysfunction within the college atmosphere.
Because the Anti-Corruption Authority dominated after analyzing, evaluating and investigating the nameless criticism, it issues points associated to the granting of trainer licenses and, consequently, the process supplied for in these circumstances, based on the Public Training Service Rules. Due to this fact, so long as the criticism issues points that aren’t associated to acts of corruption and don’t fall throughout the Authority's competences, any additional process is terminated and the criticism is archived.
It needs to be famous that, within the occasion that the Authority considers that the knowledge earlier than it’s inadequate, it could itself conduct additional analysis to seek out further data so as to set up whether or not the nameless criticism and/or data could be successfully investigated inside of the framework of its competences.
