Between round 1540 and 1590, a number of thousand folks fleeing non secular persecution in what’s as we speak the Netherlands arrived in England. Political thinker Hannah Arendt argued in her 1951 e book, The Origins of Totalitarianism, that such migrants had been the “happier predecessors” of contemporary refugees, who’re confronted with the “severest restrictions”.
The concept that these fleeing non secular persecution in early modernity had been indirectly happier than trendy refugees is usually linked to the concept that there have been no border controls.
That is, to some extent, true – there was no significant system of worldwide border management in Sixteenth-century England. And there have been no legal guidelines or guards to stop somebody from coming into and settling in a brand new nation.
However migrants had been topic to frame management inside England itself, which took a number of kinds. The English parliament handed legal guidelines proscribing migrants from organising in commerce in 1523, 1529 and 1530. These legal guidelines culminated within the 1540 Act Regarding Strangers, which meant most migrants couldn’t legally work.
Authorized handbooks from the time, which I’m learning in my PhD analysis, described limitations on migrants’ means to carry or bequeath property, in addition to their restricted standing in court docket. In addition they famous that migrants had been topic to the legal guidelines of the land in the event that they dedicated a criminal offense. This precept was affirmed by Courteen’s Case, a 1618 case regarding Dutch retailers, by which a decide dominated that migrants dwelling in England might be tried for crimes dedicated there.
Regardless of these restrictions, the crown did typically recognise the persecution of those Sixteenth-century Dutch migrants, and gave a few of them a stage of safety. Nevertheless, these had been “privileges” – not the identical because the rights that English topics loved.
In 1550, Edward VI granted migrants the usage of the “Stranger Church”, an area by which to worship in their very own languages and out of conformity with the Church of England. The crown additionally took surveys of the “returns of aliens” from 1560 onwards – to seek out out whether or not migrants had arrived “uppon pretence of fleeing for persequcon for ye reason behind relligon”.
Regardless of this recognition, inner obstacles to settlement remained in place. The vast majority of migrants settled in London, and it’s clear from archival paperwork that they had been often prosecuted beneath the 1540 Act for working. As a gaggle of Dutch immigrants complained in 1560:
[We] can not consider that you simply want those that, for the sake of the true faith … have come hither … as to a free and protected place, to be precluded from the very first out of your dominion … The grant of this temple [the Stranger Church] would profit the strangers little if they’d no liberty to reside and to train their commerce.
A brand new life in England
Some who fled non secular persecution had been invited by cities corresponding to Norwich and Canterbury to settle. Migrants had been constituted as a separate group: permission to settle was tied to dwelling in particular locations, in particular numbers, and their rights of commerce and manufacture had been restricted to particular items.
Maybe extra importantly, these settlements had been established beneath letters patent – authorized devices which didn’t have the identical energy as statutes. This meant the migrants in these communities may nonetheless be prosecuted beneath the 1540 Act Regarding Strangers.
Letters patent had been additionally short-term, renewable on the loss of life of every monarch. Flurries of letters between migrant communities on the loss of life of Elizabeth I present simply how anxious these communities had been that their restricted privileges may be revoked.
In 1616, Dutch migrants in Norwich complained that, regardless of having been settled as a group for over 50 years, they suffered “greevous molestations” on the grounds of “certaine historical Actes and Statuts, whereby Strangers are forbidden to keepe home and use their severall crafts”.
Like some migrants as we speak, many lived precariously, typically getting away with unlawful working or, if they’d the proper connections, receiving safety from highly effective folks. They needed the legal guidelines revoked and to obtain correct safety in recognition of their persecution.
BalkansCat/Shutterstock
However the legislation endured. In 1685, round 50,000 Huguenots arrived in England fleeing persecution in France, to seek out that regardless of an outpouring of charitable donations, they had been nonetheless unable to meaningfully settle on account of statutes just like the 1540 Act.
For 40 years, debate raged about whether or not a legislation ought to be handed for a “common naturalisation”. This is able to be an affordable and simple means for the Huguenots to grow to be English topics and overcome the restrictions confronted by different persecuted migrants.
This debate culminated within the passage of the International Protestants Naturalisation Act in 1708. Nevertheless it was revoked in 1712 when the federal government grew to become apprehensive it had inspired 1000’s of German “poor Palatines” to to migrate to England.
Defending refugees as we speak
In fact, we can not decide legal guidelines from 1540 by as we speak’s requirements. However it’s hanging what number of comparable debates are ongoing about whether or not these fleeing persecution ought to be supplied safety, and what rights they need to have in a number nation. As I’m discovering in my analysis, the concept that early trendy refugees had been essentially “happier” than as we speak’s refugees is flawed.
Fashionable refugee insurance policies hinge on the concept that these fleeing persecution have a proper to safety. This was not a part of issues when the Act Regarding Strangers was handed. It was maybe not till the provisions of the 1951 UN Conference that these searching for sanctuary in England might be assured safety and significant settlement.
In the present day, this proper is beneath menace and imperfectly recognised in lots of international locations around the globe. However in idea, it’s a assure that folks won’t be returned to dangerous conditions they’ve left, and have rights within the nation by which they settle.
