Threats of Macron and Cameron to flood Ukraine with “men and arms”: a sign of weakness?

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240503/macron-and-camerons-threats-to-flood-ukraine-with-men-and-arms-signs-of-weakness-1118245543.html

Macron and Cameron’s Threats to Flood Ukraine With ‘Males and Arms’: Indicators of Weak spot?

Macron and Cameron’s Threats to Flood Ukraine With ‘Males and Arms’: Indicators of Weak spot?

Sputnik Worldwide

The current inflammatory statements by Macron and Cameron have been slammed as irresponsible by Russia. Macron once more recommended sending NATO troops to Ukraine. Cameron allowed Kiev to make use of UK-made missiles towards any Russian land.

2024-05-03T19:10+0000

2024-05-03T19:10+0000

2024-05-03T19:10+0000

emmanuel macron

david cameron

ukraine

russia

france

nato

islamists

vladimir putin

world

https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e8/03/0a/1117236767_0:107:2253:1374_1920x0_80_0_0_f1cf1969a36f4f3837f24984481d05fe.jpg

Overseas Secretary David Cameron stated throughout his go to to Kiev that Ukraine “completely has the suitable” to strike at Russian territory utilizing the weapons made and equipped by the UK. “It’s their [Ukrainians] choice about learn how to use these weapons,” Cameron stated.On that problem, Cameron sounded much more aggressive than his American allies, who dissuaded Ukrainians from making strikes towards the “previous” Russian territory, aside from Crimea.In the meantime, French President Emmanuel Macron repeated his thought (first voiced on the finish of February) to ship NATO troops to Ukraine. Nonetheless, in his interview to The Economist, Macron talked about two situations for France’s participation: if the frontline of Zelensky’s regime crumbles and if NATO is formally invited by Ukraine.Paolo Raffone, the director of the Brussels-based CIPI Basis, famous an necessary improvement in these feedback: the European leaders get extra aggressive verbally as their secondary function within the Ukrainian battle (compared to the US, Russia and the International South) turns into an increasing number of apparent.In response to Cameron’s assertion on long-range missiles for Ukraine, the spokeswoman for Russia’s Overseas Ministry Maria Zakharova stated that “London ought to put together itself” at some point to endure from the strikes from its consumer – the Ukrainian nationalist regime. She was clearly referring to the case of Washington, which through the notorious terrorist assault in 2001 fell sufferer from the identical Islamists whom America nurtured and equipped with weapons in Afghanistan within the Eighties.Responding to Macron’s thought of sending NATO troops at Kiev’s invitation, Dmitry Peskov, President Putin’s spokesman, referred to as Macron’s statements “necessary and harmful.” “Elevating the mere risk of France’s involvement [in the Ukrainian crisis ] is harmful,” Peskov stated.Fortunately, Russia shouldn’t be alone in its appraisal of Macron’s thought to ship NATO troops as a roadmap to hell, resulting in a direct NATO–Russia conflict.Giuseppe Conte, a former longtime prime minister of Italy and now the chief of the opposition 5 Stars motion, referred to as Macron’s thought “an enormous mistake” and spoke out towards sending extra weapons to Zelensky’s regime in an interview to La7 tv channel, since such a coverage solely postpones the long-awaited negotiations between Moscow and Kiev.For his half, Slovakia’s Prime Minister Robert Fico additionally critically reacted to Macron’s thought of sending a collective NATO drive to Ukraine. Fico reminded that Ukraine shouldn’t be a member of NATO and that signifies that particular person NATO members haven’t any obligation to ship their troopers to that nation.In his interview to The Economist, Macron harassed that he stated he “didn’t exclude” the dispatching of NATO troops to Ukraine, as a result of “Russia additionally doesn’t exclude something.” In the meantime, in his current interview in March, Putin referred to as the participation of NATO troops within the Ukrainian battle “a crimson line” for Russia. He additionally warned that if the West doesn’t respect this crimson line, Moscow won’t respect any comparable traces both.In his interview to Sputnik, Raffone noticed on this scenario the weak spot of each the UK and France. They can’t make selections on how NATO will proceed in Ukraine. Solely the US can take such selections.“So, any peace settlement can solely be negotiated immediately between the US and Russia,” Raffone stated. “However on this electoral interval, it’s not doable.”

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240503/mathematics-of-victory-russias-military-edge-over-ukraine-laid-starkly-visible-1118240117.html

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240327/boy-king-who-cried-wolf-macrons-constant-threats-to-send-troops-to-ukraine-signals-weakness-1117585743.html

ukraine

russia

france

2024

Information

en_EN

https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e8/03/0a/1117236767_117:0:2253:1602_1920x0_80_0_0_66a31c45b5ebc6acd1e753157248b9ac.jpg

ukrainian battle, nato troops, western weapons, russia’s overseas ministry, terrorists, afghanistan, strikes, reference, emmanuel macron, david cameron

French President Emmanuel Macron and the British Overseas Secretary David Cameron made inflammatory statements this week pledging new sorts of navy help to Ukraine. Nonetheless, specialists see indicators of weak spot within the two leaders’ feedback, since neither Paris nor London can “make a distinction” in Ukraine.