Ukraine Peace Plan that Involves Meeting Kremlin Demands Is a Trap, Not a Way Out — Global Issues

Opinion by Vyacheslav Likhachev (kyiv)Tuesday, February 18, 2025Inter Press ServiceVyacheslav Likhachev, based mostly in Kyiv, is an professional on the Middle for Civil Liberties, a human rights group that gained the 2022 Nobel Peace Prize

KYIV, Feb 18 (IPS) – U.S. President Donald Trump and his particular envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, have lately expressed confidence and optimism concerning the prospect of “ending” the conflict in Ukraine. No particulars have been made public; nonetheless, in line with the brand new administration’s imaginative and prescient, either side should make concessions to realize peace. But it stays unclear not solely what the proposed concessions are but additionally how precisely the US intends to influence the events to compromise.

President Trump has up to now restricted himself to imprecise threats to impose tariffs on non-existent Russian imports to the U.S. Normal Kellogg, for his half, has transparently hinted that Ukraine ought to abandon its unrealistic want to liberate its territory occupied by Russia.

The U.S. efforts to stress Ukraine to just accept vital territorial losses to Russia in change for ending the conflict are anticipated to extend. In distinction to the varied choices mentioned on the professional degree final yr, the brand new Trump administration has averted making any commitments to future safety ensures for Ukraine.

In fact, it’s nonetheless attainable {that a} vital a part of the U.S. proposal stays private. Nevertheless, it’s extra possible that the plan is designed to fulfill the ambitions of Russian chief Vladimir Putin, albeit to not the maximalist extent. So, with a Trump administration, he could also be nearer than ever to getting his approach in Ukraine.

In actual fact, this proposed deal seems indistinguishable from the Chinese language-Brazilian peace plan mentioned at numerous worldwide venues final yr. Each approaches would “freeze” the battle, giving at the very least implicit recognition of Russia’s occupation of swathes of Ukrainian territory, in addition to a everlasting foothold from which Russia can launch future aggressions.

It’s apparent why China and Russia’s different authoritarian allies would favor this plan. However why has it discovered help within the White Home?

The final logic is as follows: Ukraine isn’t ready to liberate all of its territories within the foreseeable future (particularly not with out very pricey and politically fraught U.S. help); persevering with hostilities solely convey additional struggling; and army actions, due to this fact, ought to cease as quickly as attainable.

This framework is deeply flawed and much from a good decision. Nevertheless, different choices within the present world political configuration are starting to look merely unrealistic.

If by some means it’s attainable so as to add ensures in opposition to additional Russian aggression to the “Trump—Kellogg plan,” it’ll at the very least look workable. Proponents of this mannequin cite the expertise of post-war Germany and North Korea.

Persuading Ukraine to surrender territorial integrity wouldn’t be straightforward, however it’s attainable. It’s arduous to think about what might make the Kremlin cease its troops.

It was solely final summer season that Vladimir Putin demanded that territories that Russia doesn’t de facto management be handed over to him as a situation for a ceasefire. In its personal perverse approach, that is logical – like coping with any widespread gangster, peace all the time comes at a price.

Additionally, it’s harder to think about, nonetheless, what safety commitments may very well be sturdy sufficient to stop additional Russian aggression and conflict crimes. Extra exactly, what ensures would Western leaders, who’re so afraid of escalation and any trace of a direct conflict with Russia, agree to just accept? However even when we assume {that a} resolution to those dilemmas may very well be discovered, we’d be required to just accept the occupation as irreversible.

Consideration ought to, due to this fact, be paid to the next facet, which is often omitted from the evaluation: What is going on in Ukraine’s occupied territories is basically totally different from the German state of affairs half a century in the past.

The Soviet Union didn’t deny post-war Germany’s proper to statehood (irrespective of how a lot of a puppet the East German regime was), and Moscow didn’t deny the German folks’s proper to exist.

Within the case of Ukraine, nonetheless, Russia isn’t merely attempting to undermine Ukrainian statehood – it’s attempting to destroy Ukraine as a nation and as a folks. Ukrainians, from the viewpoint of official Kremlin ideology, are Russians who’ve forgotten that they’re Russian, and Russia should remind them of this truth.

That is enjoying out within the occupied territories, the place Russian forces are implementing a regime of pressured passportization, Russification of schooling, and the systemic persecution of any non secular communities besides those that have been forcibly annexed to the Russian Orthodox Church underneath the management of the Moscow Patriarchate.

The follow of “Filtration Camps,” by which a major a part of the inhabitants of the occupied territories handed, isn’t with out purpose so paying homage to Chinese language strategies of suppressing, or some would say, destroying the Uyghur minority.

What we’re seeing in occupied Ukraine is a common sample of social re-education on an Orwellian degree.

The effectiveness of Russian strategies shouldn’t be underestimated. Violence, propaganda, and bribery of these able to imitate loyalty do their job. Ukrainians within the occupied territories are being changed into Russians. Those that suppose that this may be resolved as soon as peace has been negotiated are both enjoying dumb or are actually naive.

Governments which might be supporting Ukraine ought to as a substitute deal with army help in addition to on accountability for Russia’s crime of aggression and the atrocities going down in opposition to civilians.

The self-soothing phantasm that the China-Brazil plan (or ought to I say “the Trump-Kellogg” one now?) will convey peace to Ukraine is a harmful one, and people within the West — together with the U.S. administration —tempted to help this concept should get up to the implications of appeasing Putin.

Ought to the battle in Ukraine be “frozen” by such an accord, all it’ll do is present dictators and autocrats that nationwide sovereignty and the precise to self-determination are negotiable. In the end, this gained’t present any of us any peace or consolation, however particularly not these Ukrainians pressured to stay underneath Russia’s yoke.

© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights Reserved. Authentic supply: Inter Press Service

The place subsequent?

Hyperlink to this web page out of your web site/weblog

Add the next HTML code to your web page:

<p><a href=”https://www.globalissues.org/information/2025/02/18/39114″>Ukraine Peace Plan that Includes Assembly Kremlin Calls for Is a Lure, Not a Manner Out</a>, <cite>Inter Press Service</cite>, Tuesday, February 18, 2025 (posted by International Points)</p>

… to supply this:

Ukraine Peace Plan that Includes Assembly Kremlin Calls for Is a Lure, Not a Manner Out, Inter Press Service, Tuesday, February 18, 2025 (posted by International Points)